Key Takeaways from the Daybreak Webinar, The Anxious Generation: Social Media, Cell Phone Bans & Our Schools: 

• Cell phone bans in schools are becoming a key strategy to improve youth mental health and boost academic performance. The State of California and Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) are at the forefront of this movement. With LAUSD being the largest school district in the country to implement policies like phone-free school days.

• A holistic approach—combining phone-free schools, family education, and encouraging unstructured playtime—can help counteract the negative effects of smartphones and social media on kids' mental health. 

• Schools play a pivotal role in bringing back a play-based childhood by fostering environments that support social interaction without the distractions of digital devices. 

The Intersection of Smartphones, Social Media, and Youth Mental Health 

Over the past decade, the rise of smartphones and social media has taken a notable toll on children’s and teens’ mental health. Jonathan Haidt, author of the New York Times best-selling book The Anxious Generation, pointed out, “Levels of anxiety, depression, self-harm—all were pretty stable from the late 1990s through 2010, 2011. And all of a sudden, around 2012, the numbers just go shooting up for boys and girls.” He emphasized that this trend began long before the pandemic, highlighting that “we see this not just in the mental illness levels going up, we see it in educational levels going down since 2012, not since COVID.” This shift clearly shows the urgent need to address how digital habits are impacting young minds. Daybreak’s recent webinar tackled this head-on—exploring the potential of limiting smartphone use in schools to create healthier environments for students, teachers, and the community. 

Superintendent Alberto M. Carvalho of LAUSD emphasized the link between excessive screen time and deteriorating mental health, noting, "Mobile devices can also interfere with safety. We hear a great deal about how students need their phones in the event of an emergency. But what we've actually seen is that the use of phones among students actually interferes with their ability to focus and follow procedures during a crisis." His stance was echoed by California’s State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Tony Thurmond, who fiercely advocates at a policy level for reducing phone use to improve student well-being and learning outcomes. 

Implementing Cell Phone Bans: A Path Toward Academic and Emotional Balance 

A major part of this discussion is centered around the practical steps schools can take, with LAUSD setting an example to implement phone-free zones from “bell to bell.” By January 2025, Los Angeles Unified School District will enforce a phone-free policy to enhance student focus and safety, while accommodating exceptions for specific needs and improving communication with parents. LAUSD Board Member Nick Melvoin emphasized, “The time had come for the district to take...a bolder stance.” 

Superintendent Carvalho highlighted the importance of involving various stakeholders in shaping this policy: “We first of all engaged stakeholders, researchers... spoke with parents, students, educators, and principals to hear their voice and incorporate their voice into the development of the policy that will be enacted in the first quarter of 2025.” His team even reviewed insights from experts like Jonathan Haidt, ensuring that the approach is grounded in research and community input. “What we are seeking, quite frankly, is to provide very specific guidance and place additional restrictions on mobile device use from bell to bell,” Carvalho added.

The policy also considers the needs of students who require special accommodations. “We have plans for students who are medically needy,” Carvalho explained, “For example, students who are insulin-dependent, where they get readings on their cell phone, will continue to have access to their phone. English language learners can also use their phones for translation purposes, as well as other students who have legitimate needs during the school day.”

The benefits of this policy go beyond just reducing distractions—students have reported feeling a sense of relief and a renewed ability to engage in real-life interactions without the constant pull of their screens. 

One of the common concerns around phone restrictions is how students might communicate during emergencies. Haidt addressed this head-on, explaining that the priority should always be the students' safety: “But we have to do what's best for the kids, not what's best for our feelings. And the school security experts all say, if there's an emergency, what you want the kids to be doing is being quiet, doing what they drill to do, following directions, being alert. That's what you want. What you don't want is all the kids calling their parents and crying. That is a disaster for their safety. So you can be empathic, but then you say, look, we have to do what's best for the kids.”

These policies align closely with the four key norms proposed by Haidt to protect youth mental health:

1. No smartphones before high school: Haidt suggests that children should have only basic phones with limited apps until at least 14, keeping internet browsing off-limits.
2. No social media before 16: He highlights that this delay can protect children during a critical time when their brains are especially vulnerable to social media's negative effects.
3. Phone-free schools: Haidt recommends schools use locked pouches or lockers to store phones during the day, allowing students to focus on in-person learning and interactions.
4. More independence and free play: Haidt advocates for more unsupervised play and freedom, helping kids develop social skills and resilience away from screens.

Superintendent Thurmond's push for Assembly Bill 3216, aiming for statewide enforcement by 2026, underscores California’s dedication to transforming school environments. “I believe that California is ready for this,” Thurmond shared. The goal is to create a space where less phone use leads to better academic performance, attendance, and overall mental health for students. Importantly, he noted that the policy would evolve with input from local districts: “There are ways to work through this, and many of our districts already have worked through the scenarios, and so we'll be turning to our districts to make sure there's lots of input on how these policies play out.” This collaborative approach ensures that the needs of diverse communities are considered, making the transition smoother for schools across the state.

Schools as Catalysts for Family Engagement

The shift isn’t just happening in classrooms—schools are reaching out to families, helping them adopt healthier digital habits at home. Alex Alvarado, CEO of Daybreak Health, highlighted that schools can “bridge the divide” by guiding parents to delay smartphone use until high school and social media until at least age 16. These efforts are part of a larger strategy to ensure that kids grow up with a balance between technology and real-world interactions. 

This effort includes informing parents, in multiple languages, about the risks of mobile phone misuse and its impact on mental health—like increased anxiety, depression, and cyberbullying. By highlighting the benefits of reduced phone use, such as improved academic performance and better attendance, schools can encourage parental buy-in for these policies.

However, the challenge of supporting students' mental health extends beyond digital habits. As Tony Thurmond pointed out, “It’s ironic that our greatest challenges around mental health came when we had fewer mental health clinicians to address the needs of our students.” Even before the pandemic, California struggled to meet demand, especially in rural areas where access to mental health care is limited. This shortage highlights the importance of equipping schools with resources and support to address mental health gaps, including teletherapy, particularly in underserved communities.

Haidt captured the essence of this movement, stating, “What we need to do... is roll back the phone-based childhood and restore a play-based childhood.” Schools, in partnership with families, have the power to offer kids the chance to reconnect with a world beyond screens—a world that includes face-to-face friendships, outdoor play, and personal growth. 

Restoring a Play-Based Childhood

These changes are more than policy adjustments; they represent a cultural shift—from a childhood dominated by screens to one enriched by active, hands-on experiences. John Haidt highlighted the broader vision behind this movement: “What we're trying to do here is beyond just changing a culture. We're actually trying to change childhood. And the phone-based childhood is only twelve years old... It's been a complete disaster for kids around the world, for education around the world.”

Superintendent Carvalho expressed optimism about this transition, noting that with fewer digital distractions, students might naturally rediscover the joy of face-to-face interactions and outdoor activities. This cultural shift has the potential to create a positive ripple effect—not just in academic performance but in nurturing deeper connections and fostering a more balanced approach to growth and development. 

The changes pioneered by LAUSD could serve as a model for schools across the country and beyond, inspiring a collective effort to reclaim a healthier, more balanced childhood. With the commitment of educators and advocates like those at the Daybreak webinar, we may see a generation of kids who grow up with more joy, real-life connections, and the space to truly thrive. 

‍